DemonstrationThe metros are real. The businesses, the customers, and every figure on this site are invented to show how the instrument behaves — nothing here measures a real business.
Caliper
← All stores

Piedmont Roofing

Home services contractors · Roofing · Atlanta metro, Atlanta

rank 12 of 27JSON

Storm-season work. Began photographing every completed job in 2025.

Service Conduct Index
66.9
+0.3since Q1 ’26

Q2 ’26 · n=101 · closed June 30, 2026

0255075100Q3 ’24Q4 ’24Q1 ’25Q2 ’25Q3 ’25Q4 ’25Q1 ’26Q2 ’26Q3 ’26Third quarter 2024: 53.3 (n=46)Fourth quarter 2024: 55.1 (n=53)First quarter 2025: 58.9 (n=60)Second quarter 2025: 60.4 (n=68)Third quarter 2025: 61.1 (n=76)Fourth quarter 2025: 63.3 (n=84)First quarter 2026: 66.6 (n=92)Second quarter 2026: 66.9 (n=101)Third quarter 2026: 65.6 (n=29)
closed quarteropen quarter, provisionaly-axis is always the full 0–100 index — never zoomed to the data
in the fieldQ3 ’26 so far

29 customers have rated Piedmont Roofing this quarter, running at 65.6. Provisional — it will move, and it is not comparable to a closed quarter until it closes on September 30, 2026.

Rate your visit to be counted →
Latest closed quarter

By dimension

each dimension is the mean of its two items, on 0–100
Responsiveness66.8+1.0

Whether you can reach someone who can help, and whether things happen when promised.

Transparency72.1−3.2

Whether what you were told about money turned out to be what you paid.

Integrity61.8−1.6

Whether commitments survived contact with an opportunity to break them.

Competence68.5+3.3

Whether the thing you came for was actually done, the first time.

Respect65.3+2.1

Whether you were treated the way anyone else would have been.

Item by item

The ten questions, and how each has moved

Item means are on the 0–10 answer scale. The Index above is simply these ten, averaged and multiplied by ten — no weighting, no adjustment.

ItemStatementTrendMeanChangeDon't known
CAR-RESP1When I contacted this service department, I reached a person who could actually help me.
PRP-RESP1When I reported a problem, someone acknowledged it within a reasonable time.
HOM-RESP1They arrived within the appointment window I was given.6.49+3.44%97
VET-RESP1When my animal needed to be seen urgently, I could get an appointment.
CAR-RESP2My vehicle was ready when they told me it would be ready.
PRP-RESP2Repairs were completed within the time I was told they would take.
HOM-RESP2When I called with a question afterwards, I reached someone who could help.6.86−1.56%95
VET-RESP2I was kept updated on my animal's condition without having to chase.
CAR-TRAN1The final invoice matched the estimate I was given.
PRP-TRAN1Charges taken from my deposit or account were itemized and explained.
HOM-TRAN1The final invoice matched the quote I accepted.7.46+1.33%98
VET-TRAN1The final bill matched the estimate I was given.
CAR-TRAN2Work I declined stayed declined.
PRP-TRAN2Fees beyond the rent were disclosed before I committed.
HOM-TRAN2Additional work was priced and agreed before it was started.6.97−7.68%93
VET-TRAN2I was told what a treatment would cost before it was carried out.
CAR-INTG1The repairs they recommended were ones my vehicle actually needed.
PRP-INTG1Commitments made to me before I signed were honoured afterwards.
HOM-INTG1The work they recommended was work that needed doing.6.10−4.67%94
VET-INTG1The treatments recommended were ones my animal needed.
CAR-INTG2I was not pressured into services I had not asked about.
PRP-INTG2Changes to my rent or terms came with enough notice to plan around.
HOM-INTG2I was not pressured into a larger job than the one I asked about.6.27+1.54%97
VET-INTG2I was given a real choice, including the option to decline.
CAR-COMP1The problem I brought the vehicle in for was fixed.
PRP-COMP1Repairs were done properly rather than patched.
HOM-COMP1The problem I hired them for was resolved.7.08+5.95%96
VET-COMP1My animal's problem was correctly identified.
CAR-COMP2I did not have to come back a second time for the same fault.
PRP-COMP2I did not have to report the same problem repeatedly.
HOM-COMP2I did not have to call them back for the same fault.6.62+0.78%93
VET-COMP2I did not have to return repeatedly for the same unresolved problem.
CAR-RSPT1I was treated the way I believe any other customer would have been treated.
PRP-RSPT1I was treated the way I believe any other tenant would have been treated.
HOM-RSPT1I was treated the way I believe any other customer would have been treated.6.39+1.53%98
VET-RSPT1I was treated the way I believe any other client would have been treated.
CAR-RSPT2My questions about the work were answered without condescension.
PRP-RSPT2Entry to my home was arranged with proper notice.
HOM-RSPT2They left my home as they found it.6.67+2.77%94
VET-RSPT2My questions were answered without condescension.

Change is shown in index points (item change × 10) so it is on the same scale as the headline.

Spread

How the answers were distributed

Every answer given in Q2 ’26, pooled across all ten items. A tall middle is a metro that broadly agrees; two humps are a metro that does not.

0 answered 08 answered 115 answered 229 answered 376 answered 4135 answered 5168 answered 6182 answered 7163 answered 889 answered 990 answered 100510
Visibility

Who could answer at all

The share of answers given as not enough information. It has fallen 7.8% since Q3 ’24 — more customers can say what was done to their car than when measurement began.

5.4%−1.8 pts this quarter
Sample by quarter
Q3 ’24 · n=46Q4 ’24 · n=53Q1 ’25 · n=60Q2 ’25 · n=68Q3 ’25 · n=76Q4 ’25 · n=84Q1 ’26 · n=92Q2 ’26 · n=101Q3 ’26 · n=29
Side by side